{"id":272629,"date":"2026-04-01T13:53:15","date_gmt":"2026-04-01T17:53:15","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.solidxperts.com\/?post_type=techtips&p=272629"},"modified":"2026-04-07T09:04:39","modified_gmt":"2026-04-07T13:04:39","slug":"why-adopt-solidworks-ai-now","status":"publish","type":"techtips","link":"https:\/\/www.solidxperts.com\/en\/blog\/why-adopt-solidworks-ai-now\/","title":{"rendered":"AI won’t replace you. Someone using AI will."},"content":{"rendered":"

[vc_row full_width=”stretch_row_content” css=”.vc_custom_1634769939600{background-color: #0d1327 !important;}” el_class=”post-header”][vc_column][vc_row_inner el_class=”container”][vc_column_inner][vc_column_text el_class=”hideme subtitle”]BLOG<\/span>[\/vc_column_text][vc_column_text el_class=”hideme title”]<\/p>\n

AI won’t replace you. Someone using AI will.<\/h1>\n

[\/vc_column_text][\/vc_column_inner][\/vc_row_inner][\/vc_column][\/vc_row][vc_row el_class=”container post-featured”][vc_column][vc_column_text el_class=”return-link”]Return<\/a>[\/vc_column_text][vc_column_text el_class=”hideme”]

\"IA\"<\/div>[\/vc_column_text][\/vc_column][\/vc_row][vc_row el_class=”sass_social_container”][vc_column][vc_column_text]
<\/path><\/svg><\/span><\/a><\/path><\/svg><\/span><\/a><\/path><\/svg><\/span><\/a><\/path><\/svg><\/span><\/a><\/div>
<\/div><\/div>[\/vc_column_text][\/vc_column][\/vc_row][vc_row el_class=”container post-content”][vc_column][vc_column_text]<\/p>\n

AI may not be perfect yet, but it’s precisely why you should start using it today.<\/h2>\n

\"\"<\/a>We\u2019ve grown used to talking about artificial intelligence as if the story began in 2022. ChatGPT arrives, the public adopts it, and suddenly AI becomes a topic of casual conversation. But if we want to properly understand what\u2019s happening, we must not confuse media frenzy with historical reality. OpenAI did release ChatGPT publicly (\u201cresearch preview\u201d) on November 30, 2022, and yes, it was a real social inflection point.<\/p>\n

But AI as a field is much older. Turing formalized the intellectual framework of the \u201cimitation game\u201d as early as 1950, and the Dartmouth Proposal (1955) explicitly announced a summer 1956 project dedicated to \u201cartificial intelligence.\u201d Some early demonstrations also appeared quickly: the Ferranti Mark I ran a limited chess program in 1951 (mate-in-two).<\/p>\n

This reminder is not meant to give you a history lesson. It serves one purpose: AI is not a feature. It is a trajectory.<\/p>\n

And it resembles another well-known human trajectory: that of fire.<\/p>\n

The Fire Analogy: Understanding a Technology We Don\u2019t Yet Understand<\/h2>\n

At this point, you\u2019re probably thinking: \u201cWhat is he talking about?\u201d Stay with me.<\/p>\n

One day, in a cave, one of our ancestors discovered fire. At first, this discovery served very specific purposes: heating, lighting, protection. These were not \u201cindustrial innovations\u201d; they were immediate uses. And yet, the full chain – metallurgy, machines, steel industries – that followed from this same discovery reshaped modern history. The human on day one could not imagine the human of today. Not because they were less intelligent, but because they lacked perspective.<\/p>\n

We are at the same stage. Except instead of holding a torch, we are writing prompts. And the typical mistake in 2026 is judging AI based on what it is today, as if it were representative of tomorrow\u2019s trajectory.<\/p>\n

The Real Signal: Speed of Evolution<\/h2>\n

What matters is not only what AI does today. What matters is how fast it improves. To make that speed tangible, a cultural artifact has emerged: the \u201cWill Smith Eating Spaghetti test,\u201d now documented as an informal benchmark.<\/p>\n

Case Study: The \u201cSpaghetti Test\u201d<\/h2>\n